Showing posts with label The Middle East. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Middle East. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Libyan HIV Case

Libyan HIV Case Reveals Primitivism and Scapegoatism

Prologue


Primitive fears and hatreds can be aroused by appealing to humankind's basist nature.

Foreign medics sentenced to die in Libya case: By Lamine Ghanmi. December 19, 2006, TRIPOLI (Reuters) –

A Libyan court sentenced five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor to death on Tuesday for deliberately infecting hundreds of children with the virus that causes AIDS, provoking a chorus of Western condemnation.

Experts argue over the importance of dirty needles in HIV transmission in Africa.


There are two accounts of how hundreds of children in a Libyan hospital mysteriously contracted HIV in the late 1990s. One says unhygienic medical practices fueled the outbreak. The other argues that medical workers murdered the children, possibly in a plot sponsored by the CIA and Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service.


Chronology


Libya HIV trial of Bulgarian medics: Reuters AlertNet

Following is a chronology of key events in the case.

Feb 1999 - Nineteen Bulgarian medical workers in Libya detained in connection with investigation into how children in a hospital in the eastern town of Benghazi became infected with the HIV virus that causes AIDS. Thirteen are later freed.

click to show/hide the rest of the post


Feb 2000 - Trial of six Bulgarians - five female nurses and a male doctor - and a Palestinian doctor and nine Libyans opens at Tripoli People's Court. They are accused of deliberately infecting hundreds of Libyan children with HIV-contaminated blood products as part of conspiracy by foreign intelligence to undermine Libya. Libyan defendants are charged with negligence.

June 2, 2001 - Defendants plead not guilty. Two Bulgarian nurses retract confessions, alleging they were tortured. Libya denies this.

Feb 17, 2002 - People's Court, which tries national security cases, returns trial to ordinary court citing insufficient evidence that defendants acted against Libyan security.

Sept 3, 2003 - French doctor Luc Montagnier, who first detected the HIV virus, testifies the epidemic broke out a year before the arrival of the Bulgarians.

Sept 8 - Libyan prosecutors demand death sentences for the six Bulgarians and Palestinian accused. They demand nine Libyan officers charged with torturing the medics be tried separately.

May 6, 2004 - Libyan court sentences five Bulgarian nurses and the Palestinian doctor to death for deliberately infecting 426 children. The Bulgarian doctor is acquitted. The nine Libyans are acquitted. Torture charges against the Libyan officers are transferred to a Tripoli court. Bulgaria, the European Union and the United States condemn the death sentences as 'absurd'.

Dec 5 - Libyan Foreign Minister Mohammed Abdel-Rahman Shalgam says will discuss overturning sentences if Bulgaria offers compensation. Bulgaria refuses, saying that would be an admission of guilt.

May 28, 2005 - Bulgarian President Georgi Parvanov, visiting Libya, meets children with HIV in Benghazi and the nurses in a Tripoli prison.

June 7 - A Tripoli court acquits nine Libyan policemen and a doctor of torturing the nurses.

Oct 17 - U.S. President George W. Bush urges Libya to free the medics.

Dec 19 - Supreme Court brings forward its appeal hearing to Dec. 25.

Dec 23 - Bulgaria, Libya, the EU and the United States agree to set up fund to help to the Libyan children and their families.

Dec 25 - Libya's Supreme Court scraps death sentences against the nurses and the Palestinian doctor, sends the case back to a lower court for retrial.

Jan 21, 2006 - Families demand total of 4.4 billion euros ($5.6 billion) from donors trying to end the standoff.

April 22, 2006 - Libya court sets May 11 date for retrial.

April 28 - U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says the Bulgarian nurses have been detained for too long.

July 4 - Defendants again deny charges.

Aug 8 - AIDS outbreak was deliberate, prosecution says.

Aug 29- Prosecutor demands death penalty.

Oct 31 - Neglect caused HIV infections, the defense says.

Nov 4 - Judgment day set for Dec 19.

Dec 19 – Defendants sentenced to die.

Before the Verdict


Libya court to deliver nurses' HIV case verdict: TRIPOLI (Reuters) By Salah Sarrar. Sun Dec 17, 2006 - Five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor could face the firing squad if a Libyan court convicts them on Tuesday on charges of deliberately infecting hundreds of Libyan children with HIV.
Concluding a retrial regarded by the outside world as a test of justice in Libya, the court will make a decision that, either way, is likely to have repercussions on the north Africa's gradual rapprochement with the West. The six are accused of intentionally infecting 426 Libyan children with HIV at a hospital in Benghazi in the late 1990s. The prosecution has demanded the death penalty. The medics were convicted in a 2004 trial and sentenced to death by firing squad. But the supreme court quashed the ruling last year and ordered the case be returned to a lower court. Medical and human rights associations around the world have rallied to the medics' defense to prevent what they say may be a miscarriage of justice. But in Benghazi, where more than 50 of the infected children have died, most people have seen a member of their extended family touched by the tragedy. There is profound public anger against the nurses and international efforts to free them.

LIBYAN MEDIA WANTS GUILTY VERDICT. State-controlled media want a guilty verdict for the six, who have been in detention since 1999. Aljamahirya newspaper wrote: "What would happen if Bulgarian children were injected with the AIDS virus? Would millions of Bulgarians keep silent about the crime? We say to everyone: Our children's blood is precious."

The Sentence


Libya sentences medics to death: BBC NEWS, Tuesday, 19 December 2006. The medics have one final right of appeal against their sentences.

"They violated their obligations and sold their consciences to the devil." Abdullah Maghrebi, Father of HIV infected child.

A Libyan court has sentenced five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor to death for knowingly infecting hundreds of Libyan children with HIV.

The medics have been in detention since 1999, during which time 52 of the 426 infected children have died of Aids.

The nurses and doctor were sentenced to death in 2004, but the Supreme Court quashed the ruling after protests over the fairness of the trial.

The defendants say they are being made scapegoats for unhygienic hospitals.

The Evidence


Study backs Libya HIV case medics: BBC NEWS
The medics were arrested in 1999. Scientists have cast doubt on charges that five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor deliberately infected Libyan children with HIV.

"All the lines of scientific evidence point in the same direction," said Dr Tulio de Oliveira, Oxford University.

An international team analyzed samples taken from the infected patients. Writing in Nature, they said their work showed the HIV subtype involved began infecting patients in Libya well before the medical workers arrived in 1998. "All the lines of scientific evidence point in the same direction," said Dr. Tulio de Oliveira of Oxford University.

The medics say the children were infected through poor hygiene - and a body of scientific work supports their claims.

See also: news @ nature.com. Dirty needles, dirty dealings.: news@nature.com. Documentary draws attention to the role of hygiene in HIV transmission in Libya. Charlotte Schubert.

And: A Shocking Lack of Evidence.


Implications


This case shows once again how we in the Western World have become so politically correct that we can't say what is actually going on here. First, you have the demagogues of Libya using these poor five nurses and the doctor as pawns in an effort to foment hatred against the West. Once again, a Middle-Eastern country is using innocent humans to exact what they feel is revenge against Western dominance. Second, these demagogues are taking advantage of their populace's primitivism.

Primitivism


One thing no one ever is allowed to say anymore, but I'll say it, is that we human beings need to be enlightened. We can exist with primitive values and superstitions, and behave like animals, or we can elevate ourselves and act civilized. There are some regions of the world where primitivism rules. There, it is easy to incite the populace into an unthinking mob. In our times, much of this kind of thing exists under Muslim rule. Why is this? Let someone smarter than I answer. Of course they won't, will they? It's not politically correct. We know in our hearts, though, that these Muslim mobs we see spouting hatred towards America and Bush and so on, are the same kinds of folks that can see plots to spread HIV for political purposes.

Primitivism, Demagogues, and Liberals


I am horrified by this Libyan HIV case, but I am also concerned with the last vestiges of primitivism in our society—with, you guessed it, the demagogues and liberals.

This same kind of mob rule, blind hatred, and uncritical thinking is practiced by the liberal hate-America, hate-Bush, hate-Republican crowd. This is why I always see a tie-in with them and the conspiracy theorists. It's all paranoia, imagining what goes on behind closed doors, and convicting without evidence.

I like people who are individuals, who can think for themselves. I don't like crowds chanting together mindless mantras, like the liberals screaming "No war for oil."

Again, I don't mind if someone comes to conclusions based on unbiased investigation. Yet, our "mobs," the liberal masses, read only from sources that support their religion. Their sources contain only anti-Bush, anti-American, anti-religious, anti-military articles and opinion pieces.


click to hide most of this post


They are mindless automatons, just like the Libyans calling for the death of these fiendish medics.


Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar)



Technorati Tags for this post:
, , , , , , , , , , , ,


Saturday, December 16, 2006

Chaos in Palestine

The Shelling of Israel Continues; Assassination Attempt on Prime Minister; Clashes Between Fatah and Hamas; New Elections?


Fatah versus Hamas


Palestine is reeling. Fatah and Hamas are clashing recently in violence that leads to fears of a civil war.


Background


Palestine is evenly divided between Fatah, and Hamas control of the government, with Hamas having a slight majority, but Fatah owning the presidency. Hamas is listed as a terrorist organization by Australia, Canada, the European Union, Israel, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and is banned in Jordan. According to the US State Department, the group is funded by Iran, Palestinian expatriates, and private benefactors in Saudi Arabia and other Arab states. In a 2002 report, Human Rights Watch stated that Hamas' leaders "should be held accountable for the war crimes and crimes against humanity" that have been committed by its members.

Attack on the Prime Minister


Haniya unhurt in convoy shooting: BBC NEWS.
Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of the ruling party Hamas was unhurt after his convoy came under fire in Gaza on Friday, officials said. Relatives of a member of Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah movement killed in recent factional fighting opened fire, officials said. No-one was hurt, but one of the cars in the convoy was torched, witnesses said.

Then, Hamas accuses rival of PM attack: BBC NEWS.
Hamas has accused a key figure in the rival Fatah faction of trying to assassinate Ismail Haniyeh, the Prime Minister of the Palestinian National Authority and a senior political leader of Hamas, as he returned to Gaza from Egypt. Hamas accused Mohammad Dahlan of orchestrating the attack.

Clashes have now broken out between Hamas and Fatah supporters in Gaza City and the West Bank town of Ramallah.


click to show/hide the rest of the post





Violence


Surrounded by bodyguards, Palestinian Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh from Hamas spoke during a rally at the Yarmouk in Gaza City, Friday, Dec. 15, 2006. Mr Haniya said: "We know who opened fire."

Protesters have set up camp outside President Abbas' home.

Security forces loyal to Fatah clashed with Hamas in Ramallah.

Violence follows Hamas accusation: BBC NEWS.

Clashes have erupted between rival Palestinian factions after Hamas accused Fatah of trying to assassinate Prime Minister Ismail Haniya of Hamas. Hamas accused a senior Fatah figure of organizing an attack on Mr Haniya as he crossed into Gaza from Egypt.

Medical sources in the West Bank town of Ramallah said 32 people had been injured in clashes there. Fighting was also reported in Gaza City.

And, Killing of 3 Young Children Worsens Palestinian Tension: New York Times, By GREG MYRE, Published: December 12, 2006
Gunmen sprayed a car with bullets Monday morning in Gaza City, killing three young brothers, ages 3 to 9, who were the sons of a senior Palestinian security officer. The shootings further inflamed an already tense situation among Palestinian factions locked in a political power struggle.

Despair deepens amid Gaza's strife, by Alan Johnston, BBC News, Gaza.
One Palestinian mother said, "We want to shout, 'Stop! It's enough - what's happening in Gaza.' "We live in chaos and lawlessness."

New Elections?


President Mahmoud Abbas, the Fatah party leader, is seen as a moderate in comparison with Hamas, despite Fatah's history of violence and terrorism. He has denounced Hamas' policies of not recognizing Israel and of continuing to shell Israel despite Israel's withdrawal from Gaza. This Hamas intransigence has brought the international withholding of funds from the Palestinian Authority, halving the income of most Palestinians. Abbas is threatening to call new elections to "let the people voice their opinion on matters."
Abbas said, "Gaza is free of occupation, but there are no investors and no prosperity," he said. "We dreamed that [Gaza] would prosper and dozens of investors from all over the world came to Gaza. Nothing has come to fruition. We decided it was better to fire rockets. Israel left, said goodbye, and instead of [Gaza] remaining calm and flourishing, there are those that still prefer to fire rockets."

Democracy Does Not always Lead to Peace


In the meantime, Same old Fatah means victory for Hamas: Jerusalem Post, by KHALED ABU, Analysis:
Hamas leaders have reacted to Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's threat to call early legislative and presidential elections by declaring that they have nothing to fear at the ballot boxes. Abbas, according to his top aides, is seriously considering the possibility of holding new elections as soon as March 2007.

Hamas, which ran in the January 2006 parliamentary election for the first time, says it is so confident that its members will win a second vote that it is also now studying the possibility of contesting the presidential election.

But Hamas has made it known that it will participate in new elections only if the movement receives assurances that the vote will be conducted in a free and democratic atmosphere.

The main reason why Hamas is not afraid to run in another election is because Abbas's rival Fatah party has failed to reform itself and get rid of those officials who were voted out because of their role in financial corruption and abuse of power.

Democracy and Peace


As in Iraq, there is no peace within Palestine because of democracy. Plus, there is no tranquility for Israel because of democracy in Palestine. Too bad. The world would be better off if democracy always led to just societies that live in internal harmony and were friendly to their neighbors.

This goal, though, is not without merit, perhaps, in the long run. After all, a country might tire of violence and hatred and actually vote in new officials who do want peace. In fact, Palestine could be such a place, if Fatah ever reforms itself and earns the people's trust again. It's possible.


Conclusion


As is usual in a democracy, it is up to the people whom they elect. Then, it is up to whom they elect to create policy. Then, Israel and the U.S. must decide how to react to the elected government and the policies they enact. What is Israel to do if, after they have withdrawn from Gaza, the majority party in Gaza refuses to recognize Israel's right to exist, and continues shelling its citizens? This is the conundrum Israel has faced for years, while the world condemns them, and sympathizes with the Palestinians.


click to hide most of this post


Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar)



Technorati Tags for this post: , , , , , , ,


Thursday, December 14, 2006

Winning the War in Iraq



Iraq is winnable, I say.



Bush to Ignore the Iraq Study Group's Principle Recommendations

It is rumored that President Bush will choose to ignore the Iraq Study Group's recommendation to shift the U.S. role there from combat to training Iraqi troops, and instead will "double down" the number of troops in Iraq, siding with military advisors and John McCain. The American armed forces will, it is said, also concentrate on going after Moqtada al Sadr, who commands the rogue Mahdi Army, which is causing so many of the problems in Iraq.

If this is true, I'm partly happy, since this is part of my recommendation.
I side with McCain in wanting to increase troop levels, but I think this is useless unless we also change the nature of the war, away from political correctness and towards fighting to win.

Elephant in the Room

In addition, no one is thinking about engaging the real people with whom we are at war, Syria and Iran. These are our enemies. They are the countries that are training, arming, supplying and delivering the insurgents into Iraq. We don’t have enough troops to shut off the borders from infiltration nor supplies from these nations.

Widen the War

Americans are reluctant to widen the war. Many would prefer that we simply withdraw from Iraq. My feeling is that there is no withdrawing from this war.

click to show/hide the rest of the post


We might withdraw from Iraq, but we cannot withdraw from the war on terror, as it is not up to us to determine this. The terrorists have big goals, like dominating the Middle East, and the world, and will not rest until they have won. I prefer that we fight this war now, not later when our casualties will be whole American cities.

I prefer that we widen the war now. I disagree with the notion that we must have "boots on the ground" in every case. Our army is stretched so thin now that sending them to additional countries is not feasible. I suggest instead that we bomb the hell out of Syria and Iran. Yes, I understand the consequences. Iran would shut off its oil and maybe there'd be other oil consequences in the world, so it would devastate our economy for a while. Plus, Syria and Iran would do their best to retaliate, against us and especially against our ally, Israel.

The Only Thing to Fear, Is Fear Itself

In a time of war, a country governed by fear is destined to lose. What are we afraid of anyway? We are already at war with these people. They are trying to kill us. They are working to destroy us. Bombing Iran could stop or deter their nuclear threat. It would certainly help Israel. Israel would be in favor of the idea. It could help us win the war in Iraq.

The world, and liberals, would condemn us for this unprovoked aggression, but what else is new?

As for bombing Syria, they aren't much of a threat, except in the war in Iraq.

The upside outweighs the downside. The biggest strategic threat in the Middle East today is Iran; experts agree on this. Let's decide to win, both the war in Iraq, and the war on terror. Let's take care of this problem now.


click to hide most of this post


Rock


(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar)


Technorati Tags: , ,

Monday, December 11, 2006

Afghanistan Perspective



Sgt Dub in Aghanistan

Afghanistan is a vast country of open spaces, mountains and desert, with plenty of caves to hide in. Yesterday I featured one hotspot of the world, Lebanon, and today I will focus on Afghanistan, again with a valued commenter, Sgt Dub, who is serving our nation there at Camp Phoenix. This is Sgt Dub's second trip to the country. He is a police officer and a member of the Oklahoma National Guard. His website,

SGTDUB is a great way to learn first-hand what the daily life of one soldier is like in that war zone.






There are about 19,500 American soldiers in Afghanistan, (see Deployments of the United States Military), following the invasion in 2001 as part of Operation Enduring Freedom. Around 6,500 other soldiers from the International Security Assistance Force are also deployed in Afghanistan.


The Afghanis

The Afghan People are a diverse group, estimated at 49% Pashtun, 18% Tajik, 9% Hazara, 8% Uzbek, 4% Aimak, 3% Turkmen, and 9% other.

click to show/hide the rest of this section


The CIA fact book on languages spoken in Afghanistan is as follows: Pashto 35%, Persian (Dari) 50%, both Indo-European languages from the Iranian languages sub-family. Others include Turkic languages (primarily Uzbek and Turkmen) 9%, as well as 30 minor languages 4% (primarily Balochi and Pashai and Nuristasni. Bilingualism is common.

Afghan Government
Afghanistan is currently led by President Hamid Karzai, who was elected in October 2004. While supporters have praised Karzai's efforts to promote national reconciliation and a growing economy, critics charge him with failing to rein in the country's warlords, inability to stem corruption and the growing drug trade, and the slow pace of reconstruction. The current parliament was elected in 2005. Among the elected officials were former mujahadeen, Taliban members, communists, reformists, and Islamic fundamentalists. 28% of the delegates elected were women, 3% more than the 25% minimum guaranteed under the constitution. This made Afghanistan, long known under the Taliban for its oppression of women, one of the leading countries in terms of female representation.

The Economy
Afghanistan is an extremely impoverished country, one of the world's poorest and least developed nations. Two-thirds of the population lives on less than US 2 dollars a day. The economy has suffered greatly from the recent political and military unrest since the 1979 Soviet invasion and subsequent conflicts, while severe drought added to the nation's difficulties in 1998-2001.

The economically active population in 2002 was about 11 million (out of a total of an estimated 29 million). While there are no official unemployment rate estimates available, it is evident that it is high. The number of non-skilled young people is estimated at 3 million, which is likely to increase by some 300,000 per annum.

As much as one-third of Afghanistan's GDP comes from growing poppy and illicit drugs including opium and its two derivatives, morphine and heroin, as well as hashish production.

click to hide most of this section


Problems

One problem in Afghanistan is the resurgence of the Taliban.

click to show/hide the rest of this section


Taliban and Allies Tighten Grip in North of Pakistan: New York Times. "THE BORDER with Pakistan has a military base in South Waziristan, an unruly region on the Afghan border that is dominated by local tribes. But one sign of how limited the Pakistani government's reach is here is that soldiers on a United States base nearby say they routinely see Taliban fighters cross the mountains at night." By CARLOTTA GALL and ISMAIL KHAN, Published: December 11, 2006.
PESHAWAR, Pakistan. Islamic militants are using a recent peace deal with the government to consolidate their hold in northern Pakistan, vastly expanding their training of suicide bombers and other recruits and fortifying alliances with Al Qaeda and foreign fighters, diplomats and intelligence officials from several nations say. The result, they say, is virtually a Taliban mini-state.

click to hide most of this section



Sgt Dub's Blog

Let's see some of the daily life of one of our nation's finest in Afghanistan. For a complete look at his site and posts, go to: SGTDUB.

MONDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2006

I'm a bad blogger. Last Friday, we had a bazaar on camp where we allow local Afghans come onto camp with the goods they sell. DVDs, CDs, fur coats, jewelry, marble chess sets, cups, bowls, old rifles, swords, clothing, everything you could need in a country. Well, I finally went down with my camera and took pictures to share. My only problem is I downloaded them on the office computer and I'm in my room. Now, it's after dark, and my office is almost 100 yds from here, so the inherent danger (I'm just too lazy) is just to great for me to risk, I will just have to remember again tomorrow to get them.

This morning we went to the running track for my morning PT. We did a 2-mile circuit training. With the temperature at 34 degrees and 4 laps around the track, I'm wiped out. The deep cold air hitting the lungs is grueling. Every time I got out of my chair my first 3 steps were a limp. My knees are what they were when I was running cross-country track.


click to show/hide the rest of this section


Overall it was a decent workout. We are suppose to be back out there Wednesday for a run. What's that word I'm looking for?.....yeah.
I told you I skipped Ab Lab Saturday night and avoided one of my LTs. Well, I talked with LT. S the next day and he described how he had got a mat for each of us and then waited in the circle for me to show up. He mentioned people would come up and he would tell them "this spot is saved" and I never showed up. I couldn't help but laugh at the picture I had in my head. I think he got me back today. I had to brief LTC Y and my slides were all messed up. Of course, Y and I go back several years and he thinks this is just par for the course with me. I muddled through it the best I can, and later in the brief, another LT takes his turn to find my good slides on his brief. To which I tell LTC Y, "I found my slides Sir"

Not much else to report today, be safe and have a good day.


click to hide most of this section



SUNDAY, DECEMBER 10, 2006

Today I got to play in an old Russian tank. Of course, it has long since been in running condition, but none the less, have you been in one. At approximately 5'10 and 240 lbs, it seems that the tank was not built for a man of my size.

In fact, as I was wedging myself into one of the openings, I found myself remember Winnie the Pooh, after having some honey at Rabbit's hole and then he got stuck, where he had to stay until he lost some weight. Well, fortunately, I made it out with no real problems. We had made a trip over to Pol-e-Charki today to service some of our Ford Ranger pickups and had time to waste.


click to show/hide the rest of this section


The service garage is much like the ones back home, (being built by Americans and Europeans does help), but back in the garage you can hear the old heavy rock blaring out to include Hotel California. The garage is supervised by some Russians and all the work is done by Afghans. This took up a good portion of my day.

We had one explosion down the road from our camp last night, the intended target appears to be the police. There are a couple of different reasons and a couple different theories out there. But nobody was hurt and only minor damage to the surrounding buildings. Tomorrow we hit the track for PT. Should be fun, I know I can't wait.....until spring....or summer. Not much else to report so be safe and have a good day.


click to hide most of this section



SATURDAY, DECEMBER 09, 2006

Today was another long day. I had more paperwork than usual and it involved contacting several different people. I'm working on acquiring some winter weather clothing and equipment for about 15 people. This was quite an easy task last time I was here, place a phone call, give them the numbers, send someone to sign for it and pick it up and distribute. Today, nobody wants to do it. I have contacted the two people it should go through, both said no problem. Next, I have to submit a form through Supply, he sends it up, they should forward it to the Bde J-4, then they make the call and then I go pick up the stuff. A few more steps but do-able. No, can't go like that. First, supply calls to find out why I want the stuff, so I explain.

click to show/hide the rest of this section


Next, the S-4 calls and wants a letter of justification and some type of documentation stating it's our responsibility. I got as far as sending the documentation, but haven't started on the justification yet. I'm sure it'll get approved by summer.

Next, since I have two Air Force personnel working for me, I have to do evaluations and award packets for them. I started this the same way we do our Army evaluations. Wrong, I have to use different terminology for Air Force and can't use specific bullet comments. So, I head down and talk to the Senior Air Force NCO in charge of my people and he helps me out with what he's looking for.

With such a long day, I headed over to the Self Help shop and finally started working on my desk for my room. I spent about 2 1/2 hours in there and finally stopped for the evening so I could eat dinner and relax for the evening. I may have to be real quiet here in my room for the next 20 minutes as one of my LTs wants me to go to the Ab Lab with him again tonight. I'm not wanting to and I just ate, but they are doing it 3 nights a week so I'll start up on Tuesday.

That's about all the fun I can share with you today. Be safe and have a good day.


click to hide most of this section



Our Thanks

Thank you, Sgt Dub, for your cogent reporting of the daily life of a soldier in Afghanistan, and for your patriotic service to our nation. Thanks also to all the servicemen serving there, and across the globe.

Rock


(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar)




Sunday, December 10, 2006

Lebanon Through a Looking Glass



The Lebanon Cauldron

Lebanon is our neighbor. The world is getting so small these days, what with the Internet, the blogosphere, MySpace and YouTube, we can experience the lives of people all over the globe. I think it's instructive from time to time to "go" to places that are the hotspots and see what the locals are thinking and doing. This can open up our minds and inform our thinking on politics and war and trade.

One of my commenters, Tarek El Khatib, a 23-yr.-old consultant in Beirut, Lebanon, authors a blog, rambling and blabbering, that is instructive because it gives the honest viewpoints of a young man caught up in war and its aftermath in a country that has a tradition of democracy. While this democracy is quite violent at times, people like Tarek are allowed to speak out. Yet, leaders get assassinated when their enemies grow intolerant of free speech and political movements they view as threatening to them.



Lebanon the Country

Lebanon is a country that very much wants to succeed as a democracy in the Middle East. Its difficulty is that its geography and political makeup make it a hotbed crossroad for the world's present political tensions.

click to show/hide the rest of this section

Lebanon:
officially the Lebanese Republic, is a small, largely mountainous country in the Middle East, located at the eastern edge of the Mediterranean Sea. Lebanon is bordered by Syria to the north and east, and Israel to the south. The flag of Lebanon features the Lebanon Cedar in green against a white backdrop, with two horizontal red stripes on the top and bottom.

Until the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990), the country enjoyed relative calm and prosperity, driven by the tourism, agriculture, and banking sectors of the economy. It was considered the banking capital of the Arab world and was widely known as the "Switzerland of the Middle East" due to its financial power. Lebanon also attracted large numbers of tourists, to the point that the capital Beirut became widely referred to as the "Paris of the Middle East."

Immediately following the end of the war, there were widespread efforts to revive the economy and rebuild national infrastructure. By early 2006, a considerable degree of stability had been achieved throughout much of the country, Beirut's reconstruction was almost complete, and an increasing number of foreign tourists were pouring into Lebanon's resorts. However, the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict brought mounting civilian and military casualties, extensive damage to civilian infrastructure, and massive population displacement from July 12, 2006 until a ceasefire went into effect on August 14, 2006. As of September 2006, the Lebanese government has been acting out an early recovery plan aimed at reconstructing property destroyed by Israeli attacks in Beirut, Tyre, and other villages in southern Lebanon.


click to hide most of this section



Recent Assassinations

Rafik Hariri:
Rafic Bahaa Edine Hariri (November 1, 1944 to February 14, 2005), a self-made billionaire and business tycoon, was the Prime Minister of Lebanon from 1992 to 1998 and again from 2000 until his resignation on 20 October 2004.

click to show/hide the rest of this section


He headed five cabinets during his tenure. Hariri played a leading role in the reconstruction of Beirut. Hariri was assassinated on 14 February 2005 when explosives equivalent to around 1000 kg of TNT were detonated as his motorcade drove past the St George Hotel in the Lebanese capital, Beirut. The Syrian government is the focus of international suspicion of having committed the murder.



click to hide most of this section


Pierre Amine Gemayel:
(commonly known as Pierre Gemayel Jr., Pierre Amine or simply Pierre Gemayel; September 24, 1972 to November 21, 2006) was a Lebanese politician in the Kataeb Party, better known as the Phalanges. Lebanon's second-youngest MP, he was a rising star in his party. He was a vocal critic of Syria's military presence in and political domination of Lebanon, and an active member of the anti-Syrian and pro-Western parliamentary majority, the March 14 Alliance.

click to show/hide the rest of this section


He was serving as Minister of Industry when he was assassinated on November 21, 2006. He was the third member of his family to be assassinated in 25 years. His uncle Bachir Gemayel was assassinated in 1982, also at age 34, and Bachir's 1-year-old daughter was killed in a car bomb attack in 1981, initially supposed to target him.

Gemayal was known for being a young, outspoken member of the Lebanese government, opposed to the former occupation of Lebanon by Syria and its influence in the country. Gemayel was the fifth prominent anti-Syrian figure to be killed in Lebanon in the past two years.


click to hide most of this section


Lebanese Politics

Lebanese politics is complicated. Sunnis and Druze are supporting the government, and most Christians and Shiites (the politically and economically disenfranchised of occupied Lebanon) are uniting against it. As Sunni-Shiite antagonism engulfs Iraq in violence and stokes Iranian-Arab tensions, Lebanon is caught in political paralysis and disunity, subject to outside interference from Syria and Iran.


click to show/hide the rest of this section


Lebanon's Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora: was born into a Sunni Muslim family in Sidon in 1943, Siniora was a friend of the late Prime Minister Rafik Hariri for more than 45 years.


Siniora formed a government on July 19, 2005. It is the first government formed after the Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon and the first government to include members of Hezbollah. With regards to Hezbollah, the Siniora cabinet's official stance is that "The government considers the resistance a natural and honest expression of the Lebanese people's national rights to liberate their land and defend their honor against Israeli aggression and threats." On the other hand, the Siniora cabinet has also been working alongside the March 14 Alliance towards a peaceful disarmament of the Hezbollah military wing through an internal political process. Apart from General Michel Aoun's Free Patriotic Movement, all mainstream political currents are represented.


Hezbollah is a Shiite party allied with Iran. The FPM (the Free Patriotic Movement) is a Christian party advocates secularism, the right to vote for Lebanese Abroad and economic forensic Audit. There are several other contentious parties, vying for a voice in this battling democracy.



Ten Days and Counting of Protest


Currently, there have been 10 days and counting days of protest against Prime Minister Siniora. This all began with internal politics, but then was sparked by the assassination of Gemayel. For more details on the protest, see 2006 Lebanese Anti-Government Protest. Whether Siniora can survive the unrest, is yet to be seen. The Lebanese future is unknown at this time.


click to hide most of this section



Tarek's Blog


Without further ado, here are two posts from Tarek's blog, rambling and blabbering, followed by a post from a blog that Tarek recommends for an understanding of the Lebanese situation.


Tarek's first post.


Government Under Siege

December 6, 2006

Just to update on my previous post, a new means of protection here in Lebanon includes electrically barbed wires!!!

I don’t have much to comment about what’s going on in Lebanon… My fellow Lebanese bloggers are all doing great jobs presenting their points of views and their analyses of the situation, which kinda dwarfs me and makes me wonder what to say!! I’ll just base the post on my own experience I guess…

When the week started on Monday, and I was exposed to people, I was boiling… Boiling with hate, with anger and with the will for vengeance… Everything going on caused the inflammation of these feelings towards Hezbollah and the herds following them in Downtown Beirut… I hated how these people were just flocking there and felt like I was being violated… But upon talking to my teammate and a colleague at work (a Aounist), and then later in the day meeting up with Ali (need I say: Shiite, Hezbollah) I realized that I was really being sectarian…


click to show/hide the rest of this section


If I wanna hate what’s going on, then I should hate them politically NOT religiously… It just so happens that the majority of the people are Shiites, but that does not mean that this political struggle should be allowed to turn into a Sunni-Shiite conflict… Sunday, when a demonstrator returning home was shot, CNN reported the news as: Peaceful protests in Beirut turn deadly as Shiite is killed by Sunni fire… I felt shocked hearing it that way as if they’re reporting news from Iraq… Unfortunately, Hezbollah are not doing anything about the rising tensions and are not asking their supporters to sticking to the peaceful demonstrations in Downtown and NOT roam about in Sunni neighborhoods in Beirut… Clashes are occurring EVERY night and blood is being spilt, and blood only brings more blood… Yesterday at the commemoration of the person who died, chants were being made “Death to Siniora, Death to Siniora…” If Siniora is really responsible for his death, then Nasrallah, is responsible for the 1,400 people who died during the July war initiated by Hezbollah… The latter party is not doing anything to calm its people down and its disgusting demagogue media is only spreading hate among its people… And its people would blindly follow a call for calm from Hassan Nasrallah… The Future Current, has been repeatedly wondering why this call has not been made.

But come to think about it, if Nasrallah officially acknowledges that sectarian tension is being caused by this protest, and therefore calls for calm, then in case this calm is not restored, it would look like the protestors are getting out of Hezbollah’s grip and therefore the latter will have to call the protests off… But as a fellow blogger said, the damage has been done… He was talking in more economic terms, but I think that the sectarian damage has been done, and the fragile accept-others sentiment has disappeared ESPECIALLY from the hearts of the Beirutis and Sunnis in general… They see the highest Sunni post being toppled by Shiites followed by our dear old Maronite General who was against the removal of the cancer Lahoud by street protests himself only a year ago… So assuming that Hezbollah’s intentions are good, and that all they want to do is modify the structure of the government, then the image they are presenting to all is that a Shiite militia followed by the anti-March 14 parties and the FPMers is trying to topple down the only thing that reminds us that a cedar revolution actually happened last year…

Today though, most of the newspapers seem optimistic that a solution is brewing; I sure hope so… I, and Lebanon, can’t take it anymore…

I miss just posting about my boring life and the worthless things that I would do, and I REALLY hate that all my posts are turning political, but I’m afraid that that is what Lebanon is all about right now, and I think that is the fundamental flaw in the Lebanese system: The people are too politicized and are just a bunch of herds…


click to hide most of this section


Tarek's second post.

Fort Lebanon

November 29, 2006

Lebanon has literally turned into one big security zone, sorta like a barrack... Added to the previous cement blocks around important buildings where people can't park, fences are now being placed at night in the middle of the streets to slow down any suspected car... It's a b**** trying to swerve around the fences in the middle of the night, and watch out if you missed one of them and you're speeding!!!

THIS IS NOT MY LEBANON... And nor is it the Lebanon that so many died for... Lebanon is a country of peace and a country of life, and all its citizens are supposed to be embraced like that... But unfortunately, the security situation deteriorated so badly that extra security measures had to be taken... There are cameras being installed ALL OVER Beirut, to capture the next assassin or the next bomber...


click to show/hide the rest of this section


It's really pathetic, and it doesn't look like it's gonna get any better... The political deadlock reached looks like Hizbuallah are taking to the streets, leading behind them the Aounis and Amal, but I'm hoping that THAT will get it out of their system, and people would get back to being reasonable and look at Lebanon's interests.. Hehehehehe.. Ok fine, LIKE THAT WILL EVER HAPPEN?!

There's a campaign going on in Beirut with billboards saying, I love Life, and I want to live in peace and all that, and I'm actually looking forward to seeing the outcome of that campaign... But one of the billboards said the second uprising, so I fear that March 14 is behind this campaign... Now I’m for March 14 and everything, but I was kinda hoping a third stream would be created that is neither March 14, nor March 8; a non-sectarian party that people will start following because this third movement wants what's best for Lebanon NOT what's best for their own... You think that will ever happen? There's the 05amam movement; hope that goes somewhere...

Hope to write soon; i.e. hope I stay alive to be able to write something!


click to hide most of this section


Then, here is a post from the blog that Tarek recommended to me for learning about the Lebanese situation, by Abu Kais,

From Beirut to the Beltway:
December 9, 2006


Assad regime to Kill Berri if He Convenes Parliament

The Assad regime is in a hurry. Nasrallah hasn’t been able to deliver quickly enough. The Grand Serail is a fortress, and the Lebanese street is slowly turning against the protestors, who don’t even have safe passage back to their homes now. The orders from the Dark Lord’s council are to pack more people in downtown Beirut, and as soon as possible. The plan to occupy or lay siege to the Rafik Hariri International airport seems to be in full swing, although the Lebanese army will reportedly not allow it.
What’s the hurry for?


click to show/hide the rest of this section


This Sunday, the 15-day time limit for Lahoud to sign the Hariri tribunal plan expires. As of Monday, the cabinet can constitutionally send it to parliament for endorsement.

Nabih Berri is in a pickle. He was forced to declare the cabinet session that approved the tribunal unconstitutional after telling journalists days before, that it wasn’t. On Wednesday, when it appeared that there was a dim hope of reaching a settlement, the speaker of parliament received a death threat from Maher Assad, Bashar’s brother. According to al-Seyassah, Assad threatened to kill Berri if he calls parliament into session to approve the plan (Again, al-Seyassah is to be read with a grain of salt, although they've gotten it right in the past with regards to Lebanon. In any case, this isn't the first time we've heard this.)

That’s how Lahoud’s term was extended, by threatening even pro-Syrian ministers who hated Lahoud (including Suleiman Franjieh). And that’s how the Syrian security regime worked in Lebanon—a regime that Nasrallah found no shame praising during his infamous speech that followed the threat to Berri. In that speech, Nasrallah challenged his opponents to find him one incident where a protestor was killed on his way back from a protest during the Syrian reign. Aounists must have found this funny, or let it go over their heads like the many sick jokes and embarrassing insults their Napoleonic leader utters every day. They, of all people, should know how many of them were taken to Syrian jails, how many were tortured, killed, and threatened because they dared protest when protests weren’t even allowed. And why bring up the deep past when the recent past bears testimony to the murders committed by the Assad regime—a regime Nasrallah considers better than the Siniora government. So good that he thanked the Syrian army for its sacrifices in Lebanon less than a month after Hariri was killed.
Pretty soon, there will be no one left to remind Nasrallah’s worshippers of all these crimes. Not when Assad is allowed to complete the plan to assassinate anyone who speaks, let alone protests, against Hizbullah’s second favorite regime.


click to hide most of this section


Go to the site for more good stuff, From Beirut to the Beltway.

Thank you Tarek, and thanks to Abu Kais.


Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar)




Saturday, December 9, 2006

A Ray of Hope for Iraq



O
il. The libs may have been so wrong about it that it will make their heads spin like in Regan in The Exorcist. Oil might bring peace and democracy to Iraq.


New Development Brings Hope for Iraq

Paz, one of my bright liberal commenters, will accuse me today of changing my mind again about Iraq, and he may be right this time. In fact, I might be doing one of those cartoon-like double takes because I saw something today in the New York Times, my favorite (not!) balanced (not!) newspaper that, if true, would vindicate the Stay the Coursers on Iraq and put to shame the Cut and Runners.

Iraqis Near Deal on Distribution of Oil Revenues by Population - New York Times By EDWARD WONG, Published: December 9, 2006
BAGHDAD. Iraqi officials are near agreement on a national oil law that would give the central government the power to distribute current and future oil revenues to the provinces or regions, based on their population, Iraqi and American officials say.

If enacted, the measure, drafted by a committee of politicians and ministers, could help resolve a highly divisive issue that has consistently blocked efforts to reconcile the country's feuding ethnic and sectarian factions. Sunni Arabs, who lead the insurgency, have opposed the idea of regional autonomy for fear that they would be deprived of a fair share of the country's oil wealth, which is concentrated in the Shiite south and Kurdish north. The Iraq Study Group report stressed that an oil law guaranteeing an equitable distribution of revenues was crucial to the process of national reconciliation, and thus to ending the war.


If this report is true, then this is a stunning behind the scenes development that could bring about Bush's vision of a united Iraq












with a fairly strong federal government, but with three regional states that guard the interests of the Sunnis, Shias, and Kurds. At stake are the fourth largest oil reserves in the world, one of the reasons why the whole world is interested in what happens in the Iraq war.

click to show/hide the rest of the post


Oil for Peace

If you notice this New York Times article, my Dear libs, the United States will not be sharing in the largess from the oil. The oil will be divided between the three Iraqi regions. Read the article to get the details. Yes, of course, American oil companies will get a large portion of the oil contracts for construction and handling of the oil, but this is entirely appropriate, since America paid for this right with its blood. Why should French or Russian companies get anything?

Anyway, the effect of this agreement, if it should happen (and it looks like it will) will mean that the Iraqis will then have a monetary motivation for peace. In order to make money from splitting the oil revenues in three, the new states would benefit from an orderly environment, or no new investment would be forthcoming. This is great news.

It still does not mean that outside forces, like Iran, will not try to get their share of the oil and power, but at least some internal forces in Iraq will be aligned for peace instead of for war. The oil agreement will also not decrease some of the sectarian hatred in Iraq. The Sunnis will still hate the Shias will hate the Kurds, and so on; but they will all be smiling more, because their lives will start to change for the better. They will be able to rebuild their country again, if they choose to do so, and then benefit even more from the oil revenues.

Implications

What does this mean for the U.S., and for Bush? This is major, and the first ray of hope I've seen there in years. This means that democracy does have a chance in Iraq. This means that it might be possible after all to form a strong-enough federal government there. This also means that I possibly have been wrong lately in my pessimism about Iraq, as have 70% of Americans, and that Bush was the smart guy in the room.

I will make a bold prediction. Most of the world, including the New York Times, who wrote the article, and especially the liberals, will under-report this new development, and miss the implications of it for the future of Iraq. Liberals will never admit that democracy could work in Iraq. It's against their religion.

So, go ahead Paz, make my day, tell me I've changed my mind again. I'm glad to do it, in the interest of truth, as always. I'm excited to do it in this case. Tell me you understand the implications of this development, and that you're glad that democracy might come to Iraq—and that Bush was right all along. Sorry, forgot, it's against your religion.

Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar)


click to hide most of this post




Friday, December 8, 2006

Were the Democrats Right About Iraq?



Is Iraq like Vietnam?

Iraq, is it Vietnam? Paz, one of my liberal commenters, whom I am grateful to for his passion and commitment to the positions of his side, made some points in a comment yesterday that are worthy of a detailed response in a post. Conservatives have criticized liberals in the past for their positions on Iraq. Yet, it appears that some of us now agree with what liberals said a year ago—namely, that Iraq is similar to Vietnam, and so on.

My opinion is that Iraq was not similar to Vietnam a year ago, but now it is.







The reasons it has become similar are:

1. The Iraqis are not fighting hard enough to win their own freedom.

2. The liberal press has undermined the war effort, and prevented us from fighting to win.

3. We don’t have a President Truman or FDR in office who will ignore political correctness and do what it takes to install democracy in Iraq, using overwhelming force like we did in WWII with Germany and Japan.

Stay the Course

Basically, those of us who welcome the national debate on Iraq being conducted now because of the Iraq Study Group, are presumably pitted against those who are steadfast in their Stay the Course opinion. I don’t see it this way. I am still for Stay the Course, as I always was, except I want more troops and more vicious fighting to effect it. On this, I agree with Senator John McCain, at least on the more troops part of the equation.

I am a pragmatist, though. I don’t see this congress, and this president, and this American public, propagandized by liberals, agreeing with Senator McCain, nor with me. We aren’t going to get more troops in Iraq, and we certainly aren’t going to be allowed to fight the war the way it ought to be fought—the way we fought in World War II.

click to show/hide the rest of the post

Therefore, leaving our troops basically as standing guard in streets that are descending into civil war, in target zones for foreign insurgents, without allowing them to really fight, is cruel and unwise. Do I want to Stay the Course in Iraq? Yes, if we are allowed to Stay the Course and Win. Otherwise, we need to do some kind of pullback, and let the Iraqis kill each other if they choose this way of behaving. In this case, we must still remain in the region, in safer zones, to prevent the complete domination of the Middle East by Iran.


Did We Make Mistakes in Iraq?

Yes. I know some of you are fans of Donald Rumsfeld, and I can agree that the man was courageous in trying to change the nature of our armed forces to meet the challenges of the 21st century. On the other hand, I believe Colin Powell was right in saying we ought either to have not invaded Iraq, or gone in with overwhelming force—including an overwhelming force for the post invasion phase. We simply never had enough troops to deal with any insurgency. We can’t police the borders with Iran and Syria with the numbers we have. We can’t stop trouble spots and then hold them. Our present number of troops could be sufficient if the Iraqis were fighting with us, but they’re not.

Was It a Mistake to Invade Iraq?

No. Saddam Hussein was a villain who needed to go; and he was intent on causing serious trouble for the world. We are better off with him gone, regardless of civil war in Iraq. We just need to be nimble, to adjust to the changing situation there.

Did our American Soldiers Die in Vain?

No. The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq have altered the worldwide equation for peace in a dramatic fashion. 9/11 has been answered in a way that ensures future terrorists will think hard about an unprovoked major attack on our soil. Terrorists know now that should they drop a nuke on us, for example, we will hunt them down and kill them, and go beyond this—we will take their countries away and send them into the hills and caves.

Plus:

A major villain is off the world stage.
The Iraqis have been given a chance for democracy.
Democracy is at least being considered in other parts of the Middle East.
Libya is no longer a threat.
Renewed efforts at peace for Israel and Palestine are being promoted with a new urgency.

The last reason why our soldiers did not die in vain is that invading Iraq was simply the right and moral thing to do. We stood up to a bully who was killing innocents, and who would kill other innocents in the future. It is never wrong to do the right thing, regardless of consequences.

The Strategic Situation Now

The major threat now is Iran. The failure in Iraq can give Iran an opening to expand its hegemony in the Middle East; or, we can handle this problem wisely. Since we have a base in Iraq, we are still in a good position strategically to keep Iran from overrunning the area. We don’t need to stay in the middle of the Iraq civil war in order to do this; merely being in the area would be enough.

The nuclear question is another matter. I don’t see that there is any worldwide will to stop Iran from getting the bomb, thanks to the liberals’ beloved U.N. Ideally what should we do? Invade Iran and effect regime change, and shut down their nuclear operations. Will we do this? No. Why? Because of the touchy feely liberals in our country, and because of the lack of will in the U.N.

What is for sure, given the present political situation, is that Iran will get the bomb. Then what? I’m not smart enough to say. What do you think?

Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar)

click to hide most of this post



Thursday, December 7, 2006

The Iraq Study Group



(God bless all veterans and soldiers now serving, and all America, on this anniversary of Pearl Harbor.)

It's a Good Thing


Baker and The Iraq Study Group has been a good thing, in my opinion, in that it has gotten the United States government and its people thinking about solutions to the Iraq problem.




The Iraq Study Group has gotten all sectors of the world, and of the United States, involved and invested in solving the Iraq conundrum. Most of us don’t understand all the factors involved in this whole mess over there, but we do know that something is wrong, and needs to be fixed. I would argue that no one is wise enough, given all the complexities, to know what is the best thing to do, but the Group made a good effort.

Another good thing about the Iraq Study Group is that Democrats and liberals are again thinking, which is unusual for them. A bad part of the Group is that these same liberals are engaging in their favorite pastime, which is gotcha politics. Many Democrats spend their whole day finding things the evil Republicans have done wrong. They feel vindicated by the Baker Commission Report, (another name for the Iraq Study Group), which basically says that Iraq is a mess, we ought to get out, and we ought to be talking with Syria and Iran.

Syria and Iran love the report. Al-Queda loves the report. The Shias love it. The Sunnis hate it. Saudi Arabia hates it. The bulk of the world loves it.


click to show/hide the rest of the post


Fight to Win or Get Out


Personally, I still remain a neo-con on the war in Iraq. I wish we were waging it all-out, and to win. We aren’t now and never were. We’ve fought a tentative, politically correct war almost the whole time (except for the initial invasion, which was waged the way a war ought to be waged, with overwhelming force.) We’ve never had enough troops in Iraq to handle the post war. On this, I remain in agreement with Colin Powell, who wanted either that we don’t invade Iraq, or that we do so with overwhelming force. John McCain also wants more troops in Iraq, not less. It was Rumsfeld’s idea that we go lean and mean after the initial invasion. This, in my opinion was a mistake.

Since we do not have a President who has the courage to wage an all-out war as is necessary, then the next best alternative, then, is to think about alternatives, now that our politically correct war has made such a mess. So, in this set of circumstances, the Baker Commission is a good thing.

Let's Do It


Again considering that we do not have the will to wage an all-out war in Iraq, the recommendations of the report are, I believe, good ones. We either need to fight to win in Iraq, or get out. If we “get out,” we need to stay in the region, maybe Iraq itself, in areas where our soldiers won’t be targets, to protect against a total takeover by Iran and the Shias; but other than this, we need to get out of the way, and let the Iraqis kill each other until they work things out for themselves. Yes, you panting conspiracy theorists, we do need to protect the oil reserves in Iraq, and keep them from falling into terrorist hands, or to Iran.

Rock

(*Wikipedia is always my source unless indicated.)

Subscribe to my feed
                                          

Join me in the war on error, in the fight for truth, justice, and the American way! Support this site! Wanna swap links? It’ll help us both. Truth—The No Spin Politically Incorrect Zone

Join Rock's Political Blog Ring. Both Liberals and Conservatives are Welcome. (see left side bar)

click to hide most of this post



Wednesday, December 6, 2006

Sgt Dub to Ahmadinejad



Sgt Dub is an American hero, although he never would say this himself.

This is a first for me. I’m posting twice today. Since Sgt Dub says some things better than I was able, I am going to post his comments on Ahmadinejad for yesterday’s article as a post in and of itself. I hope you don’t mind, Sgt.

Then, I’m going to post the article I wrote for today’s post, on Hugo Chavez, who I call The Clown, based on a comment from one of my readers.

Visit Sgt Dub’s blog, at SGTDUB, for a first-hand experience of a soldier serving in Afghanistan, a great guy with a level head, communicating with the world from one of the hotspots on the globe. We remain appreciative of what you do, Sgt.

Here is the first post, Sgt. Dub responding to Ahmadinejad’s letters:




Rock, I read his letter to Noble Americans on Sunday, and immediately felt compelled to respond, of course. This may get long but I will cut it down to just the parts I responded to.

Ahmadinejad:
Our nation has always extended its hand of friendship to all other nations of the world.

Dub:
Taking a hostage by the elbow and escorting him is not considered a hand of friendship in this country.

Ahmadinejad:
Hundreds of thousands of my Iranian compatriots are living amongst you in friendship and peace, and are contributing positively to your society. Our people have been in contact with you over the past many years and have maintained these contacts despite the unnecessary restrictions of US authorities.

Dub:
Yes, there are many Iranian people who fled the oppressive and destructive nature of Iran in hopes of finding a better place to live and we welcomed them to our country.

click to show/hide the rest of the post


Ahmadinejad:
In Iraq, about one hundred and fifty thousand American soldiers, separated from their families and loved ones, are operating under the command of the current US administration. A substantial number of them have been killed or wounded and their presence in Iraq has tarnished the image of the American people and government.

Dub:
I consider a "substantial number" an exaggeration on your part.

Ahmadinejad:
You have heard that the US administration is kidnapping its presumed opponents from across the globe and arbitrarily holding them without trial or any international supervision in horrendous prisons that it has established in various parts of the world. God knows who these detainees actually are, and what terrible fate awaits them.
You have certainly heard the sad stories of the Guantanamo and Abu-Ghraib prisons. The US administration attempts to justify them through its proclaimed "war on terror." But every one knows that such behavior, in fact, offends global public opinion, exacerbates resentment and thereby spreads terrorism, and tarnishes the US image and its credibility among nations.

Dub:
First, kidnapping is described as the illegal abduction against one's will, and describes the tactics you might be familiar with, and the tactics used by the factions your country has sent into Iraq to push the so called civil war. The insurgents that have been captured by us have been taken during battle or by intelligence gathered, each being a target and not just an opportunity. The possibility that some may be innocent is possible but the kidnappings in Iraq by factions under the control of Iran and other groups are of civilians who are innocent. The detainees suffer far less than those taken by the factions at large in Iraq, who are doomed to certain torture and execution.

Ahmadinejad:
The US administration does not accept accountability before any organization, institution or council. The US administration has undermined the credibility of international organizations, particularly the United Nations and its Security Council. But, I do not intend to address all the challenges and calamities in this message.

Dub:
You bring up undermining the credibility of international organizations, particularly the United Nations and its Security Council? In this country we say, “Isn’t that the kettle calling the pot black?” The war in Iraq had the backing of the United Nations and continues to see international support. Only when cowards attack innocent civilians in other countries do we see some countries falter and pull back. It seems you think intimidation works on everyone; well, it only works on the frail.

Ahmadinejad:
Undoubtedly, the American people are not satisfied with this behavior and they showed their discontent in the recent elections. I hope that in the wake of the mid-term elections, the administration of President Bush will have heard and will heed the message of the American people.

Dub:
America has continually changed the seat of power since the onset of elections in this country. That is the freedom of self-rule. The fear that you show of President Bush just shows how little you understand the American political system. That power here has the ability to change every four years and we have done it without bloodshed and kidnapping; can you say that?

Ahmadinejad:
We all condemn terrorism, because its victims are the innocent.

Dub:
Then condemn the dogs of war that you support, Hamas and Hezbollah.

Ahmadinejad:
It is possible to govern based on an approach that is distinctly different from one of coercion, force and injustice.

Dub:
Does November 4, 1979 ring a bell?
I could obviously go on further, but I should stop here. thanks for letting me rant.


Thank you Sgt Dub. We are all grateful for your contributions to the world by serving in Afghanistan, by your blog, and by your regular comments on my blog, which I believe is also making a small contribution to the world, with truth. Thanks again, Sgt., and God bless.

Rock


click to hide most of this post